<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Information Advantage &#187; Kenneth A. Rubin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ironmountain.com/author/krubin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ironmountain.com</link>
	<description>We all have information. Lots of it. But how many of us have harnessed it into a true competitive advantage? That’s the discussion here: realizing greater value from your data, while minimizing its risks. We hope you’ll join us.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:22:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The State of Scanning, Paper and EMR Transition</title>
		<link>http://blog.ironmountain.com/2011/compliance/the-state-of-scanning-paper-and-emr-transition/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ironmountain.com/2011/compliance/the-state-of-scanning-paper-and-emr-transition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth A. Rubin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Document Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Records Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospitals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meaningful Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scanning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ironmountain.com/?p=1295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[July 13th will mark the one-year anniversary of the enactment of the Rules for Meaningful Use. The rules, drafted by the Centers for Medicaid &#38; Medicare, define the minimum requirements that providers must meet through their use of certified EHR technology in order to qualify for Medicare and Medicaid incentive payments. At stake: A share [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>July 13th will mark the one-year anniversary of the enactment of the <a href="https://webmail.ironmountain.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=179e065089e34879b24c92045c9b4f2c&amp;URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.cms.gov%2fEHRIncentivePrograms%2f30_Meaningful_Use.asp">Rules for Meaningful Use</a>. The rules, drafted by the Centers for Medicaid &amp; Medicare, define the minimum requirements that providers must meet through their use of certified <a href="http://www.ironmountain.com/documents/management/healthcare-information-management.html">EHR</a> technology in order to qualify for Medicare and Medicaid incentive payments. At stake: A share of the $19 billion set aside in subsidies and stimulus funds for demonstrating “meaningful use.”</p>
<p>Unfortunately, Meaningful Use didn’t provide any <a href="https://webmail.ironmountain.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=179e065089e34879b24c92045c9b4f2c&amp;URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ironmountain.com%2fNewsArticle.aspx%3fid%3d17179873116">recommendations</a> (or incentives) for how best to organize and scan records into an <a href="http://www.ironmountain.com/records/his/ehr.asp">EMR</a> system; as a result, hospitals are going about it in a variety of ways – some efficient, some not.  </p>
<p>With the clock ticking on this deadline and the potential for a share of billions, we wanted to see just how this process was going. Our <a href="http://www.ironmountain.com/health-information/healthcare.html">own experience</a> from consulting with hospitals tells us that this process has been disjointed, so we asked 200 health information professionals involved in their hospitals records scanning process for EMR how they were doing. The results, posted below, confirmed what we had seen amongst our customers.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-1317" href="http://blog.ironmountain.com/2011/compliance/the-state-of-scanning-paper-and-emr-transition/attachment/iron-mountain-hc-survey3-2/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1317" title="Iron Mountain Health Care Survey" src="http://blog.ironmountain.com/wp-content/uploads/Iron-Mountain-HC-Survey31.jpg" alt="Iron Mountain Health Care Survey" width="563" height="918" /></a></p>
<p>So what do you think? Anything surprising about these stats? If you’re an information executive at a hospital, does this reflect your own EMR transition? Let me know!</p>
<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.ironmountain.com%2F2011%2Fcompliance%2Fthe-state-of-scanning-paper-and-emr-transition%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=80" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:80px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ironmountain.com/2011/compliance/the-state-of-scanning-paper-and-emr-transition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

